Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- Meet "OSHbot" Lowes New Store Helper; Goodbye Retail Associates, Hello Robots
- No Plans for Normalization: Fed Ends QE, Will Hold Rates Low for "Considerable Time", Will Reinvest Proceeds
- NASA Rocket With Russian-Made Engine Explodes On Takeoff; Ironies Abound
- MH17-Chief Investigator Investigates Possibility of Air-to-Air Missile, Seeks Cooperation From Russia
Meet "OSHbot" Lowes New Store Helper; Goodbye Retail Associates, Hello Robots Posted: 29 Oct 2014 01:51 PM PDT Goodbye Retail Associates, Hello Robots The future of shopping has arrived, and it's not human. Not only do robots cost less than humans, they don't complain, they speak multiple languages, and most importantly, by scanning aisles they know where every item is in the store and can take you straight to it. Meet "OSHbot" OSHbot is the newest member of the "Fellow Robots" family, and developed in partnership with Lowes Innovation Labs. The future of shopping has arrivedOSHbot Specs
OSHbot Technologies
Making Science Fiction a Reality The robot will come up to you and say in a pleasant tone "Hello I am OSHBot, your store robot helper. What can I help you with." Show OSHbot a screw, and OSHbot will scan the item and take you to the exact match, or tell you if it's out of stock. Not even the most knowledgeable human clerk can do that. OSHbot Articles The Wall Street Journal reports Newest Workers for Lowe's: Robots The LA Times says Robot sales clerk? 'OSHbot' to debut in San Jose OSHbot Video The following video explains everything you need to know. It's well worth a play. OSHbot Experience Would you rather deal with an associate who may be unfriendly and typically does not know where things are, or OSHbot? I would take OSHbot 7 days a week. I suspect so would most. And even if you wouldn't, it's guaranteed to happen anyway. Robots do not complain, they show up on time, they want to help, they don't ask for overtime, and they do not need medical insurance, Social Security, or pensions. All of the greeters and helpers at WalMart, Lowes, Home Depot, Target, and retailers in general will give way to "Fellow Robots". And that will happen sooner than anyone realizes. Deflationary Forces OSHbot, competition, and technology in general are inherently price-deflationary. With that thought, I suggest that the Fed, Central Banks, and Governments are on a failed mission. Sure, they can raise the minimum wage and engage in inflationary policies, but they cannot halt the march of technology and create jobs at the same time. Every hike in minimum wages or healthcare subsidies is an extra added incentive for corporations to use hardware and software robots. Inept Central Bank Policies Asset bubbles of increasing magnitude over time coupled with rising income inequality is a direct consequence of inept central bank deflation-fighting exercises. For further discussion please consider Challenge to Keynesians "Prove Rising Prices Provide an Overall Economic Benefit". Inquiring minds may also wish to consider James Grant Conference Video: Inflation Expectations, Growth, Policy Problems; Europe Has Become Japan. The next asset bust, as well as the Fed's response to it, are likely to be spectacular. Addendum A few interesting comments came within minutes. Here are a couple of them. Gordon writes "This is great for the mom and pops of the world but ask the robot about the hammer and what actually works instead of just trying to sell someone a hammer and it cannot tell you." Jon responds: "Good catch. I can't tell you how many times I've gone to Lowe's or Home Depot with a DYI project and the guy walked me around and told me how to do the same thing at half the cost that I budgeted. All at the expense to the company's margins of course. But those dudes are the best." My reply: Robots will never replace everyone, just a huge portion of such workers. Moreover, and over time, these robots will get smarter and smarter, complete with how-to videos. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Posted: 29 Oct 2014 11:47 AM PDT Inquiring minds may wish to slog through today's FOMC Press Release on Monetary Policy but it's really not worth the time it takes to read it. Here are a few details, generally expected
Reinvesting Principal Payments The Fed also released a Statement Regarding Purchases of Treasury Securities and Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities. NEW YORK — On October 29, 2014, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) directed the Open Market Trading Desk (the Desk) at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to conclude the current asset purchase program by the end of October . The FOMC also directed the Desk to maintain the existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from the Federal Reserve's holdings of agency debt and agency MBS in agency MBS and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. This policy, by keeping the Committee's holdings of longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative financial conditions.10-Year Treasury Yield Curve Watchers Anonymous points out the yield on 10-year treasuries barely budged today as shown in this chart of $TNX. The 10-year treasury yield is up slightly today to 2.32% a rise of about 4 basis points. Yield is down about 20 basis points since the end of September.. No Plans For Normalization In spite of a bit of rah-rah about jobs, the Fed practically committed to holding rates low indefinitely. Here is the key statement: "The Committee currently anticipates that, even after employment and inflation are near mandate-consistent levels, economic conditions may, for some time, warrant keeping the target federal funds rate below levels the Committee views as normal in the longer run. " In addition, the Fed will continue to reinvest proceeds from treasuries and agencies in a manner "to be announced". Hikes? Forget about them. They are not coming. Correction I inadvertently posted a chart of TLT (a treasury fund) instead of $TNX, the treasury yield. Text above modified accordingly. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
NASA Rocket With Russian-Made Engine Explodes On Takeoff; Ironies Abound Posted: 29 Oct 2014 11:03 AM PDT Sanctions or not, NASA uses Russian-made engines to propel rockets. Yesterday, just seconds after takeoff, a NASA Antares rocket with a Russian-made engine exploded on takeoff. The mission was to carry supplies to the orbiting space station. Today, the Guardian reports that Russian rocket manufacturer insists it is not to blame for Antares crash. The Russian maker of the engine used in the unmanned US supply rocket that exploded after liftoff in Virginia denied on Wednesday that its product was at fault for the catastrophe.Spectacular Video Please click on the link to see a fascinating video of the explosion. Ironies Abound For all the hundreds of billions of dollars of wasteful military spending, the US does not even build its own rocket engines. In spite of sanctions, the US relies on Russian-made engines, even for military satellites. To top it off, sanctions bar exporting the engines elsewhere, even though we use them here! It's yet another perfect example of blatant US hypocrisy. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Posted: 29 Oct 2014 12:58 AM PDT Spiegel Online interviews Fred Westerbeke, the Dutch lead investigator of flight MH17 crash. Westerbeke states that a surface-to-air missile is the most likely scenario, but he also discusses "secret satellite images and a possible involvement of the Ukrainian military." Here are edited interview snips from MH17-Chief Investigator Westerbeke: "Do the Russians Have More Evidence?" Who shot flight MH17 from over Eastern Ukraine? The Dutch prosecutor Fred Westerbeke directs international investigation. He talks about secret satellite images and a possible involvement of the Ukrainian military.Notes: Translation from German is frequently difficult. I edited the Google translation to make it more readable. Also there is a bit more in the interview regarding rewards, bounties, the coming Winter, etc., but those clips were not very relevant so I truncated the translation a bit. Investigative Problems That seems like a pretty frank discussion of the issues, arguably the best we could have reasonably hoped for. Clearly, many investigative problems remain. The first problem, which Westerbeke admitted, is that if Ukraine is involved, it will seek to prevent that finding. Nonetheless, Westerbeke was polite in his response stating there is no evidence Kiev has not been open. The second problem is that no countries really want cooperation from Russia. Fortunately, it seems the investigative team does. A third problem is US satellite evidence. Where the hell is it? A fourth problem (unfortunately one that Spiegel never inquired about) regards flight deviations and tower to plane transmissions. Without a doubt transmissions should be made available and flight pattern deviations over a war zone explained. If that has not been done (and I don't believe it has), then indeed there is strong evidence that Kiev has not been completely open. The fifth problem is that even if the team concludes MH17 was downed by a surface-to-air attack, that alone does not prove who fired the missile. Rush to Judgment Finally, please note the "rush to judgment" by Ukraine, the US, Europe, and Western media in spite of glaring weaknesses in evidence gathered. Nonetheless, it appears as if Westerbeke wants to do the job. Appearance or reality? If the latter, I wonder if he pokes around too much, if he will be removed from the mission. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment